There are some seats where the number of informal votes well and truly overtake the difference between the two front runners.
Votes are still being counted in several key seats from the recent election — and the margins are razor-thin:
Bean (ACT): just 19 votes separate the frontrunners
Kooyong (VIC): 723-vote margin
Bradfield (NSW): only 215 votes apart
These aren’t isolated cases. And what’s making a difference? Not just who people voted for — but how.
This year, there were thousands of informal votes. Informal votes don’t get counted toward any candidate and effectively represent a “what could’ve been” for each individual potential vote. They happen when:
The ballot is left blank
Ticks or crosses are used instead of numbers
Not enough boxes are filled in
There’s writing that identifies the voter
Basically, anything that breaks the rules can void your vote — even if you intended to vote.
The number of informal votes in these close seats is huge compared to the actual margins:
Bean: 2,400 informal votes — with just 15 votes separating candidates
In Bean, there are 160 times more informal votes than the difference between the top two candidates.
Bradfield: 5,000 informal — 215-vote margin
That’s 26 times more informal votes than the difference between the top two candidates.
Kooyong: 1,900 informal — 700-vote margin
Former Deputy Prime Minister Micheal McCormack has told the ABC he thought casting an informal vote was “shameful”.
🗣️ "Anybody who wastes their vote needs to take a good, long, hard look at themselves."
No, not every informal vote would go to the same candidate. But the data makes one thing clear:
Yes, your vote matters.
And in close elections, it matters even more.
So next time someone says voting is pointless or doesn’t change anything, show them this.
Because even drawing a dick on a ballot is a choice — and in these races, choosing to do it might just cancel out your actual power. As impressive as your drawing might be.