Do either of the major parties' housing policies actually make sense?

It's clear the big two don't care if a bunch of experts call their policies dumb.

🧠 Reality check: There was a time when Australians weren’t obsessed with housing prices. That’s hard to imagine now, with the median house price in Adelaide hitting $1 million — a stark reminder of how far things have spun out of control.

šŸ” Why it matters: Despite bold campaign promises, the major parties’ housing policies could do more to inflate prices than fix affordability.

🧠 What’s happening:

  • The Coalition and Labor are both pitching big housing plans ahead of the election.

  • Each party claims to support first home buyers — but economists warn their proposals will actually push prices higher.

šŸ‘ The good: Supply-side solutions

Both parties acknowledge the need to build more homes:

  • Coalition: $5 billion infrastructure fund to help councils build roads, sewerage, and power for new developments.

  • Labor: $10 billion plan to build 100,000 new homes, exclusively for first-home buyers.

Yes, but: While helpful, these are longer-term plays. And the policies making waves are the ones that give people more cash to throw into an overheated market.

šŸ‘Ž The bad: Demand-boosting giveaways

  • Coalition

    • Let first home buyers access up to $50,000 from super for a deposit.

    • Allow mortgage interest tax deductions on newly built homes.

    • āš ļø Problem: That $50K could be worth $500,000 at retirement if left in super (based on 8% compound annual returns over a 30 year period).

    • āš ļø Higher-income earners benefit most from tax deductions.

  • Labor:

    • Let first home buyers purchase with just a 5% deposit.

    • āš ļø Problem: Risky lending. Critics warn it won’t ease demand and increases financial exposure for the government.

šŸ“ˆ What the experts say:

  • CoreLogic’s Tim Lawless estimates these policies could lift house prices by at least 5%. As a ā€œconservative guess.ā€

  • Economist Chris Richardson calls it a ā€œdumpster fire of dumbā€, arguing it’s the classic mistake: more money chasing the same number of homes.

šŸŽ¤ The spin:

  • At the ABC debate, both leaders dodged questions about price pressures, focusing instead on supply.

  • Dutton rolled out his son to talk about housing struggles — while quietly admitting Dutton Jr. will rely on the Bank of Mum and Dad.

  • Albanese continues spruiking the benefits, downplaying inflationary risks.

šŸ’¬ The bottom line:

Australia’s housing crisis isn’t just about access — it’s about policy choices. Right now, both major parties are betting on popularity over prudence. And young Australians dreaming of homeownership? They’re left hoping for more than just good intentions.

šŸŽ„ Here’s the full report.