⏱️You’re reading the National Account’s newsletter, sent on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Subscribe here.
👋 G’day everyone, Archie here. 
By the time this newsletter hits your inbox, I’ll be on the road to Port Stephens, just north of Newcastle - I’m imagining I’ll be looking like something out of a Jimmy Buffett song - beach, Hawaiian shirt, some good mates and maybe one singular cheeky beverage.
I’ll let you know how it rates on Monday.
Anyway, I‘m excited to get on the road, so let’s crack on with the news 🗞️.

620,000 Australians are considered to be problem gamblers and another, far larger group of almost 2.9 million Australians, are considered to be at risk gamblers
🗣️ Why did she say that?
New data from research firm Roy Morgan has revealed the number of problem gamblers in Australia has increased by 110,000 people in 12 months.
The majority of those problem gamblers are under the age of 35 - which did surprise me, given some of the stereotypes around problem gamblers being oldies at the pokies.
In fact, just 0.7% of over 65s were considered problem gamblers, in comparison to 4.9% of 25 - 34 year olds and 4.6% of 18-24 year olds.
For my full breakdown check out today’s video:
If you or someone you know might need some help with their gambling, there is a national helpline here.
🩺 More free doctors? Hopefully!
I also filed this VERY quick explainer on how, from tomorrow, new Federal Government funding will hopefully increase the number of bulk billed GPs near you.
Around the Grounds 🦘
Across the country, things are happening at a local level that have an impact nationally. Here are the stories you might not hear about in the traditional media.
⛺ Glamping dreams hit a roadblock
A proposal to build two small glamping pods on steep farmland in Baw Baw Shire has reignited debate over whether Victoria’s farm zoning rules are shutting out regional tourism.
When eco-tourism operator Eli Fratkin pitched his plan, councillors were split — some arguing it fit with the shire’s “open for business” push, while others said the farming zone exists to protect agricultural land, not add “a proliferation of houses and businesses”.
The council ultimately voted 6–3 against the project, with several councillors calling for a review of the shire’s farm zone definitions to clarify where low-impact tourism should be allowed.
Read that story by clicking below 👇
👩🚒 Are female Victorian firefighters being paid thousands less?
In Victoria’s forest firefighting crews, women are allegedly being paid thousands less than men doing the same dangerous work.
That’s according to the Australian Workers’ Union, which says the gender pay gap among Forest Fire Management Victoria field staff has tripled in four years.
However, Victoria’s Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action said the figures reflect “workforce composition”, not discrimination, insisting there’s “no gender pay difference” for the same job.
Read that story by clicking below 👇
👶 Turning down free money
Parents in Melbourne’s eastern suburbs have hit out at Knox Council after it refused to apply for a federal scheme that would boost childcare wages by at least 15 percent — despite the money not costing the council or families a cent.
Knox Council told The Eastern Melburnian it already pays staff “above the award rate” and raised concerns about the scheme’s temporary funding model.
But unions and parents say the council has “played games” and that it “beggars belief” that long-time educators will now miss out on backpay dating to December.
Federal MP for Aston, Mary Doyle, said she’s “disappointed” the council missed the deadline but hopes it’ll reconsider.
Read that story by clicking below 👇
Labor’s Environmental Christmas present
This week, there has been a lot of chatter about Labor’s planned reforms to Australia’s environmental law. Something that can, to be honest, quite easily become a bit of a snorefest very quickly, despite how important these laws are.
So I’ve tried to take a slightly different approach on this one to get you up to speed on what these laws are and why Labor is struggling to get them through the Senate.
TLDR: They’re not strong enough for the Greens and not weak enough for the Coalition.

Thanks for catching up with me. I hope you enjoyed this issue, and I’d love to hear your thoughts. Just reply to this email and I’ll be on the other side 👋
I’ll be back on Monday, with a Port Stephens review!
Cheers, Archie




